This is a nice piece of propaganda right there hehe....* j0 @6 O$ r: g. r, y; E# e
- V3 D1 [- B, Q7 E) a$ O' I
Well let me break it down a little...
3 d: s/ Q& z6 j' D" \) m/ P
+ j9 \ `) e2 G8 E4 R' G: j! @China/Tiwan. This wouldn't have happened as Tiwan's stance has always been "I will only attack, IF attacked". They stocked up weapon only after several incidents. This coupled with their two party political system means that there was never a chance a war would have started. Regardless of support. If it happened it would have been an 'invasion' rather than a war.8 h2 g2 q6 R6 l7 P, ^) d3 O
( A2 S- z1 e1 x& O6 L$ k: \China/Japan. This is silly even to suggest. Japan at the end of the WW2, as the losing team signed "Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution". This means that there will be No Wars for their country. All of their military are only trained for peace keeping excercises only. For America (on the winning team of WW2) to go against their own forced contract on japan would be stupid and unwise./ h( E- k, e" f
+ O* a! G5 i' N+ d
China/India. I don't know much about the political atmosphere about this one, but from reports and suppliers I deal with. It seems that the dissent is generally religious and not politicial.
% U7 y2 T8 O( `
3 E5 _$ q1 ]! n4 c1 K0 j" e- iAmerica sells weapons to many countries over the years, America also has a habbit of signing all kinds of treaties... thats well ... America. Whilst looking at the examples from LZ they may seem to draw a pattern, however looking at the pure numbers do not even come close to drawing an conclusion. j1 @& |% ?6 F* l4 z
* Z2 \7 I+ U1 n/ x% u9 vI'd also like to add that posts like that only succeed in further segregating China to the rest of the world, rather than helping it...