他不仅第一个从学校抛出教师，还扬言说“就算是我妈我也不会救”
* a: e( Q2 I' Q+ G& W3 N所以网友给他写了一首“范跑跑之歌”超级搞笑，笑死我了8 X7 O" V# K7 a5 M# l& v

这人我看了。。1 O/ L) K! p# i# i# I3 A- Y8 p3 Q
一虎一席的5 s5 N* _7 J' t- Y( P
特别不要脸

何必炒作他呢。。$ L( v. d1 I) m/ G1 P
他攒便宜了

我看到一个道德沦丧的国家中一个诚实的人的下场

败类~玷污高尚职业，扰乱社会风气，应该受到比开除更严厉的处分~例如老虎凳，辣椒水。。。

我看到一个道德沦丧的国家中一个诚实的人的下场. e. |+ u, P9 b% }7 P! N

4 @6 _6 T- `- |4 U  B5 i, vSelfishness should never be confused as right, and when it is, thats when you know the country is 道德沦丧.  I wouldn't say what he did was wrong, as self perservation is a right, but it does speak volumns for his lack of virtues...  And his ability to speak the truth does not even close to making up for those lacks...

我一直想问, `- F+ R; n* Q# J, c9 u) X
逃生是一个人的本能··
3 r* y5 S) a5 j& }: A6 n自救也是一个人的本能··' a5 v; V2 C8 F+ g; ~
书本教我们要会舍己救人，社会教会我们人不为己天诛地灭) j5 _* P7 u1 A' v
做什么才是对的，一个人基本的求生能力都要被批判··我们中国人的真正价值观又是什么？
% H7 z- `5 U* x3 _$ E! K灾害来临时··特别是地震，生与死就在那么几秒间。。人的本能反应不是往外跑是什么？& q$ B. t0 v9 q+ A  \$ _
试问有多少人遇到地震时想到的是自己的性命不要紧，救人才是主要的？又有多少人会下意识的往外跑？( Y% N. @  O8 l0 H2 l2 I% Z- G2 n
难道非要用死来渲染一个老师应该尽的职责，难道只有死才能体现一个中国人的精神价值? 也只能用死来烘托一个具有源远流长千年文化历史的中华民族的道德？ 这是我们真正想要的道德么？

It's not about been Chinese or not, it's about been human.  I admit there are plenty of corruption in the virtues of the old, and the new generation of thought is all about me me me... but just because it's prevalent doesnt necessarily make that thought right.6 S" J' z" h* j' E1 s3 B5 A
Society as a whole is about helping one another to survive, thats why societies were created, we humans are a social animal.  With out that mentality, you see the common selfish acts which are prevalent in china today and causes the general breakdown of society through distrust.  When you have a breakdown of that mentality, it is only a matter of time before the society itself falls apart.  ( o/ O2 K+ G/ [& s  D: O( `* s
As you can easily see from this incident... united we stand, divided we fall...
' ?1 N: j0 Z) {* I3 L/ V& z7 O3 l3 p3 |6 Y
From a psychological point of view, those who only think about themselves do not contribute to society but merely takes away.  Therefore they are a burdon to keep around in a society.  Humans with in that society will act harshly towards that person in order to 'cast out' such unbenificial additives.  It's all very logical actually

引用:

原帖由 黑暗天使 于 2008-6-18 09:47 发表
+ j* H. O$ b9 {" MIt's not about been Chinese or not, it's about been human.  I admit there are plenty of corruption in the virtues of the old, and the new generation of thought is all about me me me... but just becaus ...

* W6 }( Y3 }$ f6 _% E0 wWhat's wrong with self-survive?0 K& N: ~* @. g* V( j
Being a teacher still doesnt necessarly mean he has to sacrifice his life when it comes to natural disaster. What he should've done is to lead those kids out the building, but with fear, some people just dont think that much. That is scientifically proven that self-survive is a nature of human.8 ^- m$ S5 P9 Y- V: Z: k8 Y
I reckon you have to be alive before you will even be able to help some people in need, don't you?
# U# N( e/ B1 E: ?He contributes his time and his knowledge to the society, in return, does the society expect him to give up his life to save those kids? Yet, is this his obligation to do so? Morally, it is. Lawfully, it's not!6 W! {  G( R1 r/ e+ @5 V2 `
Do you want the number of casualty in the earthquake to add another one? In total, one doesnt really make too much difference. However, to individual it means a lot! Is he really wrong?% d7 Q$ j7 R5 {" F+ P
  V! i6 Q! F; K
[ 本帖最后由 neurotic 于 2008-6-18 18:11 编辑 ]